Australian Vaccination Network condemned by health authorities for harassing & misleading parents

July 13, 2010

I’ve written before about the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN – [snicker]) and its despicable leader, Meryl Dorey. Now it seems that Australian health officials have something to say about them as well. The New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) has produced a report condemning the claims and activities of the AVN.

Unfortunately, the HCCC is only demanding the AVN to place an easily ignorable disclaimer on their website. According to the HCCC’s AVN Final Report (PDF):

The Australian Vaccination Network should include an appropriate statement in a prominent position on its website which states:

  1. the Australian Vaccination Network’s purpose is to provide information against vaccination in order to balance what it believes is the substantial amount of pro-vaccination information available elsewhere;
  2. the information provided should not be read as medical advice; and
  3. the decision about whether or not to vaccinate should be made in consultation with a health care provider.

The report also makes reference to the alleged harassment of the parents of Dana McCaffery, a 4-week-old Australian infant who died of the easily preventable pertussis specifically because she was too young to receive the vaccine and the disease was allowed to spread by irresponsible locals who chose not to vaccinate.

ABC covered the story here:

And you can hear more of Meryl Dorey spouting out dangerous misinformation on a radio show where fortunately, the hosts weren’t buying her bullshit.

Meryl Dorey and the AVN are so despicable they make the Westboro Baptist Church seem pleasant by comparison.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ten Ways To Disappoint A Christian Trying To Make Atheists Cry

July 11, 2010
Cults and new religious movements in literatur...
Image via Wikipedia

I came across an article from a misguided Christian fundamentalist and felt inclined to respond to it. The article is titled Ten Ways To Make Atheists Cry.

1. Discuss the Fermi Paradox. Atheists love aliens because they always assume that, a) brainy creatures gushing out of every galactic cranny shows that Earth is low-rent cosmic real estate, and b) the smartest aliens will be atheists. Against this giddy optimism, the famous physicist Enrico Fermi asked a quite innocent question: If Earth is a typical planet, and there are lots of planets in the universe, then why haven’t any extraterrestrial critters dropped by, or even sent us a text message (“ur nt solo, n btw ur nt vry smrt”)?

No actual atheist I’ve ever met has ever resembled this straw man you’ve constructed and the only thing atheists have in common is their lack of belief in any deities. So every sentence here that begins with “Atheists believe…” is entirely baseless since, unlike religion, atheism comes with no core tenets.

The very premise here is self-refuting as the assumption being made is that “atheists believe” that “Earth is a typical planet,” and thus that humans are a typical species. So if we lack the means to traverse the universe to find other intelligent life, why would the expectation be that similar species in the universe would be technologically advanced enough to seek out other intelligent species? And the amount of nuance involved in such a close encounter that’s simply ignored by you is enormous.

2. Join Mensa. Atheists are obsessed with their IQs and they love to flaunt their membership in an organization of people dedicated to self-congratulation. The atheist assumption is that religion is a sure sign of evolutionary atavism. A devout believer whipping out his Mensa card is entirely incomprehensible and ultimately indigestible.

I am an atheist and I have no high regard for either Mensa or the vague and almost meaningless concept of IQ. Mensa is already full of a bunch of pompous windbag religious people often with little to show for their allegedly amazing intellects. No thank you. There’s a big difference between IQ and the ability to think critically. Typically, people who think they’re too smart to be fool are the easiest to fool.

3. Bait and Switch # 1. Atheists love to talk about the Spanish Inquisition. Get them, ever so casually, to talk about persecution by zealous believers in general, and then the persecution by zealous Marxists in particular. Finally, since atheists like math, have them compare the number killed by the Inquisition over several centuries (2,000-6,000) with the number killed by devout Marxists in one century (100,000,000).

This Marxist thing has already been thoroughly refuted in every bestselling atheist book over the past few years. Marxism and Nationalism are ideologies in the same way as religion is an ideology. Again, atheism itself has no core beliefs of any kind. So while individual atheists may hold ideologies, it’s no more an attribute of atheism than pedophilia is an attribute of Christianity. I know Marxist atheists, libertarian atheists, and many more atheists who ascribe to no such political or economic ideology. And one this that is quite clear from the history is that none of the 20th century atrocities Christians love to cite that were arguably ordered by atheists were ever committed in the name of atheism, and the fact that some of these people happened to be atheist was as wholly irrelevant to the events as the fact that they had mustaches. The same cannot be said of the Crusades or the Inquisition, which were ordered by the highest Church leaders and was almost exclusively motivated by religion for religious purposes.

4. Bait and Switch # 2. Despite their pretence to moral relativity, atheists will still grant that Adolf Hitler was epically evil. Having gotten them to admit this point, offer to read aloud some of the most offending passages from Mein Kamp (a special copy of which you just happened to be carrying). After about a half-hour, suddenly strike a quizzical look and say, “Wait a minute,” removing the dust jacket, “How did that happen? This is my copy of Margaret Sanger’s The Pivot of Civilization! Say, wasn’t she the founder of Planned Parenthood?”

Ah Margaret Sanger, the woman who makes Christians cry. Sanger may have had some unsavory views. I’m not entirely sure which stories about her are myths and which aren’t. But many people in her time  has unsavory views by today’s standards. But that’s not what you dislike about her. You dislike the practice of abortion. And because you can’t find a rational argument against abortion, you feel it necessary to attack the messenger instead. Fine. Go right ahead. I am an atheist and I don’t really care if you malign Sanger as a person or not. She could have been the most evil person in history and it still would not invalidate abortion as a legitimate medical procedure.

5. Learn to talk like William F. Buckley. A comfortable prejudice for American atheists is that religious believers all speak with a heavy Southern accent and use small words.

As an atheist, I hold no such prejudice.

6. Have Lots of Children. Atheists love humanity as long as there is less of it. They are especially grieved by biologically prodigious believers who seem to be taking Darwin at his word, but for all the wrong reasons. Nothing is more irksome than to behold their own future self-imposed extinction amidst the swelling tide of the God-fearing.

As an atheist, I don’t care how many children you have so long as I don’t have to pay for them. Besides, it doesn’t matter how many children you have as either way, your religion is doomed and there’s nothing you can do or say to stop it. 14% of Baby Boomers have no religion affiliation. 19% of Generation Xers have no religious affiliation. And 24% of Millennials have no religious affiliation. If things continue at the currect rate (and all signs indicate that they are), a third of the following generation will have no religious affiliation.

7. Host a Darwin Read-a-loud. Invite some atheist friends to read and discuss Darwin, and then read some purple passages from his Descent of Man where he waxes eloquently on the importance of eugenics, the biologically based moral and intellectual inferiority of “lesser races,” and the inevitable evolutionary extermination of the “negro” and the “Australian.”

Most of what I have to say about this is just a retread of what I said about Singer. Darwin’s personal beliefs say nothing about the validity of evolution. However, that being said, it’s also worth pointing out that you don’t seem to have ever read the text yourself or else are deliberately lying about its contexts. When Darwin used the word “race,” he meant what we call “species.” This is quite clear when read in context. Darwin was in fact an abolitionist in his day while the church at the time was pro-slavery. It’s also worth noting that its always best to keep in mind what the common attitudes were at the time. It would be easy to condemn George Washington for owning slaves but he was after all a man of his time and owning slaves was customary in that time.

8. Talk about the Impending Crash of the World Economy. Ideas have consequences, and some of the worst economic ideas were hatched by John Maynard Keynes. Make clear to your atheist interlocutor that the wide-scale adoption of Keynes’ conception of government as the grand fiddler micromanaging the economy through narcotic stimulation with freshly printed money is the single most important cause of the current American and European financial implosion. Then mention ever-so-casually, “Wasn’t Keynes an atheist?”

Here you make the same mistake as with #3. No reasonable person would claim atheists are incapable of being wrong about things. That’s just ridiculous. This would be like me condemning all Christians because Hitler was a Christian. I don’t care about John Maynard Keynes, nor do I care what his personal beliefs were. It says nothing about atheism in general or even about any other person who associates themselves as an atheist. This simply demonstrates either your inability to draw distinctions or your deliberate dishonest. No other option exists.

9. Stage a Nietzsche Practicum. Atheists love the nihilistic philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche who famously declared “God is dead.” More exactly, they love it in theory, but invariably cringe at the practical implications Nietzsche quite logically drew out: without God, there is no moral order and the strong should devour the weak, for “life itself is will to power.” Invite your favorite atheist to meet you for lunch to discuss Nietzsche. Order the most expensive meal on the menu, steal his iPhone while he’s in the bathroom, and then at the end, stick him with the check. Then on the way out snatch the keys to his Saab and speed away in it singing at full lung, “I love Nietzsche! He’s really rather peachy. A world devoid of moral qualms is far more fuuunnnn…than one that’s preachy teachy!”

I am an atheist and actually I have mixed feeling about Nietzsche. Like many historical figures, I think he had some good ideas and some bad ideas. And I’m far more closely aligned with Existentialism than Nihilism. I don’t even really know how you could have even come up with this idea that atheists worship Nietzsche like some kind of profit. On many points, I don’t care very much for him at all.

10. Assault Them with Charity (cont’d. from No. 9). Drive around the block to the restaurant again, and pull up to your fuming atheist friend. After returning the keys to his Saab and his iPhone, and shelling out your share of the tab, say “I just can’t bring myself to act as if God doesn’t exist.” Then, forever after treat him with unfailing kindness, as if he were Indian Untouchable and you were Mother Teresa.

Reports of Mother Teresa’s charitable work have been more than mildly exaggerated…mostly by her. But that’s besides the point. I love when Christians do charitable work. I’ve even encouraged fellow atheists to organize programs where atheist groups and Christian church groups work together for a charitable cause while promoting the message of tolerance at the same time. You see, I actually care about making the world a better place. Quite frankly, if the only reason you’d do charity work is because you foolishly think this “will make atheists cry,” then I feel sorry for you. And I think most Christians would as well.

Peace.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wishing I was in Vegas right now

July 11, 2010

This weekend almost every atheist and skeptical big name you can think of is in Las Vegas. From all over the world, they’ve converged on The Amazing Meeting 8 (TAM8), a several day long conference celebrating all things skepticism. It’s gotten bigger every year. Last year’s TAM7 surpassed 1000 attendees. This year I hear it’s got 1300.

I’ve never been to a TAM and this was supposed to be the year I started attending. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to do it this year though. However, I vow to attend TAM9 next year. Until then though, I’ll have to settle for The Friendly Atheist‘s Live-Blogging descriptions of the entire conference, thus far found here, here, here, here, and here.

UPDATE 7.11.10 – and here’s the link to the Live blog from the last day of TAM8.

Enhanced by Zemanta

ScienceBlog’s PepsiCo blog has gone flat

July 8, 2010

Yesterday I reported about the highly controversial blog from PepsiCo that was to be added to the regular roster at ScienceBlogs.

Well, it’s not happening. Public outrage has won out. PZ Myers reported this statement from ScienceBlog’s Adam Bly:

We have removed Food Frontiers from SB.

We apologize for what some of you viewed as a violation of your immense trust in ScienceBlogs. Although we (and many of you) believe strongly in the need to engage industry in pursuit of science-driven social change, this was clearly not the right way.

How do we empower top scientists working in industry to lead science-minded positive change within their organizations? How can a large and diverse online community made up of scientists and the science-minded public help? How do companies who seek genuine dialogue with this community engage? We’ll open this challenge up to everyone on SB and beyond in the coming days so that we can all find the right solution.

Well that was the shortest controversy ever.

Enhanced by Zemanta

ScienceBlogs response to new PepsiCo blog illustrates why Jake Crosby is dead wrong

July 7, 2010

Skepacabra is in no way sponsored by Pepsi or any other commercial enterprise.

I’ve been talking a lot lately about the flagrant hypocrisy of vaccine denialists, and particularly those at Age of Autism, who condemn their critics as “Big Pharma Shills” while ignoring their own far more serious conflicts of interest.

Now last year, young Jake Crosby started writing for Age of Autism. He was exactly what they look for over on that site. He was young, dumb, and without any medical or scientific background. Now young Jake appeared on my radar for the first time when he write a lengthy 2-part hit piece on ScienceBlogs and Seed Magazine, which maintains it. I wrote a 2-part response to young Jake’s blogs here and here. Now ScienceBlogs is home to possibly the most popular science-related blogs in the world. Among its writers are PZ Myers, Orac, PalMD, Jason Rosenhouse, Abbie Smith, and many more.

Now young Jake’s entire lengthy 2-part attack on ScienceBlogs really only made one argument, the vaccine denialists’ favorite. He called every science writer as well as the editors of the site big pharma shills (Actually, this is the only argument young Jake EVER makes against his critics. See:  here, here, and here). And his justification for this libelous accusation essentially boiled down to the fact that ads appear on the blog pages…even though few if any are related to pharmaceuticals, the ads cycle randomly and are not under the control of the writers, the writers are under no orders to hold back any criticisms of the site’s sponsors, and none of the writers on the blog make enough money off of the blogs to even make a living wage, not even PZ Myers, who arguably has the most popular English-language-speaking science blog in the world.

Now it didn’t bother young Jake that on several occasions, the bloggers over at ScienceBlogs did in fact condemn organizations whose ads appeared on their page and even expressed public outrage upon learning from readers that ads for certain institutions the bloggers despised appeared on their blog page.

He also never bothered to acknowledge the shilling done on his own website, which unlike ScienceBlogs, is covered with specific, targeted ads for products and organizations who clearly benefit from the ideology Age of Autism is selling.

But now a new blog has come to ScienceBlogs, one by PepsiCo, and big greedy shills that they are, many of the ScienceBlogs writers are expressing everything from concern to outrage over the encroachment of a commercial corporation onto their turf.

For instance, PalMD says:

The problem is not that Pepsi is “corporate” or “commercial”. This is not about “selling out to The Man.” What Pepsi produces and how it does is ironic but beside the point. The main problems are:

  1. Lack of transparency, which is somewhat improved
  2. Visual appearance, despite caveats, very similar to “real” science blogs
  3. Content produced by and for the benefit of the company that bought the space
These create all sorts of ethical problems.  It also erodes the credibility of some of us in a couple of ways, but I’ll speak only for myself.
I have spent a bit of time and energy building a little credibility with mainstream journalists, engaging them online and in person, and have started writing for a more mainstream outlet, Forbes.com.  I enjoy my role as both a writer and a physician; the more I read about journalism, the more I find myself questioning the best way to do what I do.  Given the multiple ethical challenges to what I do, I don’t appreciate being dragged into a new one with no warning.
One of the more fortunate things at ScienceBlogs has been the recruitment of experienced science writers such as Maryn McKenna, David Dobbs, Rebecca Skloot, and Deborah Blum (yes, I left some of you out, but it’s busy here tonight).  This gives me additional opportunities to learn the craft, but if they all run away from here, I lose out (as do our readers).
I have relied on a reputation (even if I were my only reader) of independence.  Ads are inevitable and not undesirable, but deceptive advertising that looks very much like my own content poses special problems for me (and for other medical bloggers).

And the always polite PZ Myers says:

They aren’t going to be doing any scienceblogging — this is straight-up commercial propaganda. You won’t be seeing much criticism of Pepsico corporate policies, or the bad nutritional habits spread by cheap fast food, or even any behind-the-scenes stories about the lives of Pepsico employees that paints a picture of the place as anything less than Edenesque. Do you think any of the ‘bloggers’ will express any controversial opinions that might annoy any potential customers?

There won’t be a scrap of honest opinion expressed over there that isn’t filtered and vetted by cautious editors before making it online, and it will all toe the Pepsi line. It’s going to be boring. It’s going to blur the line between blog content and advertising. It’s going to be bloodless dull blogging that will diminish the Scienceblogs brand.

See somewhere in between these two opinions is precisely what one ought to expect from honest journalists who aren’t simply all about the all might dollar. Now with Age of Autism, the situation is far more distressing because it isn’t just any companies advertising with them but companies like Lee Silsby who sell bogus autism treatments, a product that clearly benefits from a website devoted to getting people to buy bogus autism treatments.

Now as far as amoral corporations go, I admit that I actually like PepsiCo. They’ve stood up to the bigots at the American Family Assocation and have continued to support LGBT issues with large financial contributions. So I’m inclined to think they’re a far more ethical corporation than at least BP or the Catholic Church, for instance. But that’s not the point. It is disconcerting to see ScienceBlogs give a platform for a corporation to potentially use to exploit the name of science for their own propaganda, especially since their wealth provides them with more than enough other platforms. But the important thing here is that the ScienceBlog writers have not sold out while the Age of Autism writers have never even sold in to begin with.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Age of Profit

July 6, 2010

For some time now the vaccine deniers at Age of Autism have preached about how anyone who makes any money at all while disagreeing with them is automatically a “Big Pharma Shill” and that the mere fact that they’re making money is absolute proof of corruption and conspiracy (see: here, here, here, here, here to name a few examples).

So I was shocked…shocked to find out that Age of Autism profits off of their website. Now I’ve blogged before about how there are ads all over their site promoting specific companies that clearly benefit from Age of Autism’s message. But now they’ve gone into merchandising with t-shirts and even a new book that presumably just repeats all the stuff they say on their blog that is available for free…but in a format that requires payment.

I can’t wait to read the writers of Age of Autism condemn themselves as shills and profiteering whores as they do all of their critics. I’m sure it will happen any minute now. Yup, any minute now. Orac writes about the announcement of the new book here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is the flying car almost here?

July 5, 2010
Transition (roadable aircraft)
Image via Wikipedia

Probably not. But the flying car is back in the news as the company Terrafugia, claims it’s  delivering its car-plane, the Transition, to customers by the end of 2011.

The Transition is a long way from cartoon dad George Jetson‘s flying car zooming above traffic, or even the magical Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

“There is no launch button on the [instrument] panel,” Gersh noted.

Rather, the car-plane has wings that unfold for flying — a process the company says takes one minute — and fold back up for driving. A runway is still required to take off and land.

And at only $194,000, it’s practically a steal.

Now all we need is better video capabilities on our cell phones and Rocketeer-level jet packs and we’ll be in the future!

Image via Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

News From Around The Blogosphere 7.3.10

July 4, 2010

1. Age of Autism shills for no one…but themselves – And of course Lee Silsby, who sell drugs they claim can treat autism. Oh, never mind. Anyway, the website “Bling Is The New Black” is selling Age of Autism merchandise now, specifically $35.50 t-shirts, 15% of which goes to Age of Autism. Shit, did I say $35,50 t-shirts. For that price, they better have been provided by Jason and the Argonots.

2. In related news, Mr. Andy Wakefield is coming to NYC - He of course is the former Doctor Evil and now just Mr. Evil since he’s been stripped of his medical license 12 years after it should have been taken away. But for some reason an organization calling itself the National Autism Association is hosting him. They even have the stones to call him “Dr. Wakefield” while making a brief acknowledgment that he’s not a doctor. Yeah, and they pretty much gloss over the whole part about him being completely discredited in their description of the event. Fortunately, he’s chosen the wrong city to pollute and I vow to help lead the charge to make his stay in NYC as unpleasant an experience as possible.

3. Vampire slaying kits too rich for my blood – Mark Edward has an interesting piece on the growing number of vampire slaying kits being sold online. I’d love to keep one in my home as a conversation piece because they really are beautifully made. Just not at the prices they’re being sold, which would frighten both Van Helsing and Buffy.

4. Jimmy Carter calls religion one of the basic causes of female oppression - Holy shit this guy becomes more awesome with age!

5. Judge orders medical care for child instead of faith healing – In another perfect example of what’s the harm in religion, Circuit Judge Douglas V. Van Dyk gave the state temporary custody of the child and ordered medical treatment as directed by doctors at Oregon Health & Science University for a child of parents who believe in faith healing.

Timothy J. Wyland, 44,and Rebecca J. Wyland, 23,of Beavercreek appeared in court without an attorney. The couple, members of the Followers of Christ church, seemed stunned by events and close to tears.

The 1,200-member Followers of Christ church has received extensive media attention in recent years. The church rejects secular medicine and relies on faith-healing rituals — laying on of hands, anointing with oil, prayer and fasting — to treat illnesses.

At least a dozen Followers of Christ members attended Thursday’s hearing, including Carl Worthington, who was convicted last summer of criminal mistreatment for failing to provide adequate medical care to his fatally ill 15-month-old daughter.

Great job, judge. You may have single-handedly saved this kid’s life.


Institute for Creation Research blames the victims for atheist billboard vandalism

July 2, 2010

Christine Dao of the ironically named Institute for Creation Research knows who’s responsible for the constant vandalism of atheist and secular advertisements, the atheists themselves:

While vandalism should not be condoned, these recent events shed light on what some Americans will do when they feel that their freedom of speech is threatened. An atheist spokesman in North Carolina said their message is needed to “let people know we exist and that there’s a community here.”

Yet he failed to mention the concerted effort of atheist groups to stop religious Americans from freely exercising their religion. Not content with having the freedom themselves to worship or not as they see fit, militant atheists increasingly seek to shackle the beliefs of their fellow citizens through their own distorted interpretation of “separation of church and state.”

It is perhaps not surprising that some of those fellow citizens object.

Friendly Atheist sums it up nicely here:

I look forward to Dao’s next posting, where she says that rape is wrong, but if a woman wears revealing clothing, she’s just asking for it.

This bitch seriously has the audacity to say it’s the atheists’ fault because they should have expected Christian hypocrisy. Well I agree that we should expect Christian hypocrisy. I’m just shocked she would admit to it.

And as for the claim that we’re trying to steal their religion, that’s just asshole dumb. No one is stopping Christians from freely expressing their beliefs. Rather our goal is to protect the rule of law that keeps government bodies and public resources from being exploited to promote sectarian ideologies. Now if the religious were smart, they’d want to keep the separation between church and state because it keeps government from meddling in religious affairs. You see, it works both ways.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Music Made Me Do it…for FREE

July 2, 2010

The music video for the latest single from Fuji Minx titled “The Music Made Me Do It” has stirred a lot of controversy lately when it was banned from YouTube. That video can be viewed elsewhere here.

But now Fuji Minx is generously giving away mp3 copies of the song for FREE or you can name your price.

Talk about free speech! Check it out.

My religion is a loaded gun
I’m handing lessons out one by one
So shut your mouth and get in line
Cause I need volunteers for my sacrifice

One More (I need it)
One More (I feed it)
One More (I breed it)
One More, I Cant Stop

Don’t you feel like a contradiction
Lining up here for my crucifixion
You judged and juried but still I am free
I speak the truth while I recruit those who sin like me

One More (I need it)
One More (I feed it)
One More (I breed it)
One More

With my feet on the floor
And my back on the wall
From your pushing and all
But you don’t stop
Well you seem to think
That my liking to drink
And being pushed to the brink
Means I can’t stop
I’m letting you know
How it’s all gonna go
Are you feeling along
Cause I won’t stop
I’m in control
Got my eye on the goal
While you’re saving your soul
I’ll be singing this song

The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it
The Music Made Me Do it

One More (I need it)
One More (I feed it)
One More (I breed it)
One More, Oh Oh I cant stop

One More (I need it)
The Music, The Music, The Music
One More (I feed it)
The Music, The Music, The Music
One More (I breed it)
The Music, The Music, The Music
One More, I cant stop
credits
released 15 June 2010
Written by FUJI MINX.
Vocals by FUJI MINX.
Music by Robin Davey & FUJI MINX.

Produced & Mixed by Robin Davey & FUJI MINX.
Recorded & Mixed at GROWvision Media – CA, USA.
Mastered by Jesse Davey – London, UK.

©2010 FUJI MINX™& WTKIS for Worldwide Distribution. Made in the U.S.A. FUJI MINX™ is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers